C.H.E.K Europe Accounts — Overdue, Missing, and Full of Questions
Gavin Jennings
Paul C.H.E.K Europe Limited
Q: When were Chek Europe’s accounts due?
A: 30 September 2026.
Q: Did they file on time?
A: No — Companies House shows them as OVERDUE.
Q: What’s their total asset value on record?
A: Approximately £39,000.
Q: What does Gavin claim he earns per year?
A: £118 million per year on his website.
Q: When were their last accounts filed?
A: 31 December 2024. The 2025 accounts are still missing.
Q: Is there a fine for late filing?
A: Yes — automatic £150 penalty. Doubles if more than 3 months late.
Q: Why does this matter?
A: Because if a company claims £118 million in earnings but shows £39,000 in assets and can’t file on time — people have a right to ask: WHERE IS THE MONEY?
Paul C.H.E.K Europe Limited
The Courses — Quality vs Quantity
Q: Are Chek courses suitable for anyone, no qualifications needed?
A: The website says “no experience required.” But that’s not the full story.
Q: How deep is the CHEK system really?
A: It’s extremely in-depth. I should know — it took ME five years to learn it all properly. I’m dyslexic — I had to read the manuals THREE to FOUR times each and watch the videos THREE to FOUR times just to get all the technical terminology into my head. It’s not something you just “pick up” — it’s serious, detailed study.
Q: Why does it matter if they say “anyone can do it”?
A: Because people sign up thinking it’s accessible — then Level 1 and Level 2 students give up in droves once they realise how hard it actually is. It’s misleading marketing. They’re selling the dream — but the reality is years of dedicated, difficult study.
Q: How long does it take now — compared to before?
A: It used to take SIX years to complete the full practitioner pathway. Now they’ve cut it down to THREE years. HALF the time. So I have to ask: WHAT have they taken OUT? You can’t halve the time without halving the content. And that means students are getting LESS — but still paying the SAME high prices.
Q: Is this about education — or just making money?
A: Using the £118 million earnings figure to impress new students — while watering down the course content and lowering the entry bar — looks an awful lot like prioritising SALES over STANDARDS. More students, faster completion, bigger numbers… but what about the QUALITY of the practitioner they actually produce?
Check the accounts yourself on Companies House — it’s public record. And think carefully before you enrol — because what they’re selling and what you actually get might be two very different things.
