Paul C.H.E.K Live OFFICIAL: £3.5 Million Claim Issued Against The C.H.E.K Institute

No longer “alleged” — now officially filed, issued, and served. The court has spoken.

YouTube video

THE UPDATE:

For months, Google and other search engines have described this public dispute as “alleged.” That is no longer accurate. As of today, this matter is OFFICIAL.

A formal court claim has been filed,

reviewed, and issued by the court against the C.H.E.K Institute and Gavin Jennings. The claim seeks £3.5 million in damages following what I have documented as a sustained campaign of over 119 separate incidents targeting me personally — including email avoidance, threats, a fake lawyer’s letter, repeated video takedown attempts, refusal to honour GDPR rights, and the removal of my practitioner profile without explanation.

The court has reviewed the evidence, accepted the claim, and issued an official case number. This is no longer a disagreement between two parties — it is a matter of public record.

The court papers are being served and once received, Gavin Jennings and the C.H.E.K Institute have exactly 14 days to file an acknowledgement of service. If they do not respond within that time, the court may enter judgment in default — meaning they lose automatically and the court can order enforcement of the award.

This has never been about revenge. It has been about accountability. It has been about the truth being heard. And now, through the proper legal channels, the truth has been formally recognised.

You can read the full documented story here: Paul C.H.E.K Live: Why 119 Attacks? C.H.E.K INSTITUTE The Full Story

 

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is this a settled case or just a claim?

This is an officially issued court claim. It has not been settled or heard yet — but it is no longer “alleged.” It is a formal legal proceeding that the court has accepted and the other side must now respond to.

❓ When does the other side have to respond?

Once the papers are served, they have 14 calendar days to acknowledge service. This is a strict court deadline — not a suggestion. If they miss it, judgment can be entered against them by default.

❓ What happens if they don’t respond?

If they fail to acknowledge within the 14-day window, I can apply for default judgment. This means the court rules in my favour without a trial, and then enforcement proceedings can begin — including enforcement against business assets, bank accounts, and property.

❓ Can they just ignore it?

No. Ignoring a court claim does not make it go away — it makes it worse. The deadline is set by law, not by them. The clock is ticking regardless of whether they choose to look at it or not.

❓ Why did Google change from “alleged” to

showing the court claim?
Because it is now a matter of public record. Once a claim is issued by the court, it becomes an official legal document — and search engines update their information to reflect verified facts.

❓ What happens next?

Either they respond, we negotiate, or the court process continues. I remain open to a respectful conversation — but only through proper channels, with cleared funds, and before any content is removed. Until then, the process continues.

0Shares

Download Your FREE eBook Subscribe below and get instant access.

 

“Struggling with Chronic Pain? Get Your Free Guide”

Posture and Pain: How Correct Alignment Relieves Back Pain, Improves Performance, and Protects Your Spine

“Check your email for the e-book (may take 1–2 minutes, check spam just in case"